Matija Nalis skrev den 2025-05-07 17:21:
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 04:44:18PM +0200, Benny Pedersen via users
wrote:
Yes, score=5.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, KAM_BODY_MARKETINGBL_PCCC=0.001,
KAM_MARKETINGBL_PCCC=0.5, RELAYCOUNTRY_GREY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=3,
SPF_PASS=-0.1, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, URI_HEX=1.1] autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no
What did you mean to convey by this message, it is unclear to me?
Is it about blacklists from https://www.spamhaus.org/ ?
Also, at least SPF_HELO_NONE and URI_HEX are significantly lower in my
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf:
score SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001
score URI_HEX 0.1
have you perhaps changed their score locally?
mx ~ # grep -r URI_HEX /etc/mail/spamassassin/
/etc/mail/spamassassin/zz_scores.cf:score URI_HEX (1) (1) (1) (1)
so yes, but imho SPF_HELO_NONE should be SPF_HELO_PASS from an spamhaus
server, just to pick back of strictness :)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; s=hs2; d=5652833t.service.spamhaus.com;
i=@5652833t.service.spamhaus.com;
h=sender:from:from:reply-to:to:to:cc:cc:subject:subject:list-unsubscribe:form-sub:feedback-id:list-unsubscribe-post;
a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
bh=omY7FmFC2rsvp+qTCuoC1VZAC6mTLUYgnEnSamTsFsA=;
b=nRrMtRzGDziQW3o0+TNuP2P8YFfIGFjKv37GRo1PBL5J48L0SEzYqwg7zHWMFQ
4/dZNMSSHXKuJtMvABPkqfzQg2GKl4jCiClYN3jQed5nwOlZaSdDvssUYSUXgeF
f1qdediNReNtv48HLIIKEz3SNQN5dlhqHZSjZTIAzalX8MNakoN20YxyuMXWhKX
RcMLUJX+IySQ64e6TVPskP9+qGcpmEMfUWIjeNpdq02Qzp/LvDfZTy52LPyv9K7
ul/E5u5QK5knlNISsPCBwBz6Oaq/C4n6kCP9ypQshxZhCY2B9XClkRkYvGOZ0Fz
gLFFZEKNJS3z4OCA7t0CD6YAWatg==; q=dns/txt; t=1746624730;
x=1746887530;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; s=hs1-5652833; d=service.spamhaus.com;
i=@service.spamhaus.com;
h=sender:from:from:reply-to:to:to:cc:cc:subject:subject:list-unsubscribe:form-sub:feedback-id:list-unsubscribe-post;
a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
bh=omY7FmFC2rsvp+qTCuoC1VZAC6mTLUYgnEnSamTsFsA=;
b=XWCkY3VOhkUbEmZe73VWMsITq58A7bFBwg2kuSzqHA4aE2FABJ6JNXntPxYHbg
zYq30nphS5WlCaLzbkGrJsI/3TxLElaKsEy+qeH4vOD9taZxIPHNB6JEGIZxgC6
YZbKDS5YLAHG9e5P/asWMu97rMbIZSifp/XckrEkTzud0D/o7H4WrhpVTvjcpta
3NmL4u3Y5eQIEuG5kOHf/7weeNsW30y4dY8S3zMipjNJTqla6SvKmexCgkUjBwM
rvoNhwosXSZiBDboBWzo7ln2N6EEEGGVMQmXLc0smoVhaqpq8N45gbPTVQSihe7
euYtgyhVqgODMrRLMFh+NdiPkoNA==; q=dns/txt; t=1746624730;
x=1746887530;
could there dkim be add to whitelist by pmc members ?
Received: from bid47go.5652833t.service.spamhaus.com
(bid47go.5652833t.service.spamhaus.com [158.247.22.118])
by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0667F8CD
for <m...@junc.eu>; Wed, 07 May 2025 15:32:14 +0200 (CEST)
in dns
bid47go.5652833t.service.spamhaus.com TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
solved if spamhaus listen here
