On 2025-01-13 at 03:12:25 UTC-0500 (Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:12:25 -0600 (CST))
Dave Funk <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
is rumored to have said:

It's also possible for the messages to differ by things such as network routing headers, better to feed it all to bayes and let it get parsed/scored.

That's an important fact. One of my most active traps frequently will get 3 identical-body spams via 3 different cracked-host routes in under 5 hours when one of my pet spammers (mostly offering office products in German) switches their content substantially. Feeding those straight to Bayes means that the ~100 additional copies for real users get rejected no matter which path they arrive by.

--
 Bill Cole
 b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
 Not Currently Available For Hire

Reply via email to