On 2024-11-21 at 11:26:35 UTC-0500 (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 11:26:35 -0500)
AJ Weber <awe...@comcast.net>
is rumored to have said:
Thanks Bill,
I just went back to check and IDK when it started, but I have a perl
issue:
spamassassin --lint
Subroutine File::Spec::Unix::canonpath redefined at
/usr/share/perl5/XSLoader.pm line 111.
Subroutine File::Spec::Unix::catdir redefined at
/usr/share/perl5/XSLoader.pm line 111.
Subroutine File::Spec::Unix::catfile redefined at
/usr/share/perl5/XSLoader.pm line 111.
(I do have the KAM channel separately on my sa-update.)
I only see a response to this issue from 2016...anyone have a tidy way
for me to "fix" this perl issue???
I think those are just warnings, but it *may* indicate that you need to
reinstall File::Spec::Unix, which is part of the PathTools distribution.
Thanks again
On 11/21/2024 11:23 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2024-11-21 at 10:45:58 UTC-0500 (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:45:58 -0500)
AJ Weber <awe...@comcast.net>
is rumored to have said:
Thanks Kevin,
Have trusted KAM rules for a long time. I assume they're still now
in the main rules updates?
The KAM rules are an independent rules channel that you must
explicitly set up.
Unlike the rules maintained by the SpamAssassin Project, the KAM
rules are not subjected to the RuleQA process which re-scores the
default rules nightly and automatically avoids widespread FPs.
I'll double-check my logs to make sure I'm fetching the latest.
It is simple to set up the KAM rules channel alongside the default
rules channel to assure that you get updates regularly.
-AJ
On 11/21/2024 8:11 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't provide a recap but I can tell you that the KAM Ruleset has
been consistently looking at these, blocking phone numbers, looking
at their techniques, adding rules, etc. It's very frustrating
though because they seem to be abusing PayPal's systems to send
them.
The key pattern that I've noticed is that they all contain a phone
number to call.
Side note: Any one got a good contact at the FCC? I've been wanting
to talk to them so they can figure out what provider(s) are
facilitating this.
Regards,
KAM
On 11/21/2024 7:57 AM, AJ Weber wrote:
I saw a "conversation" a few weeks ago regarding paypal phishing
emails that were not being caught.
I can't recall if anyone found a reasonable solution (or new
rules).
I just received one and it seems very well crafted. Is anyone
still collecting samples and wants this one too?
Thanks for any recap anyone can provide.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
