joe a wrote:
Maybe I should not ask this, but . . .
A relatively innocuous member informational email from a local town Library
(monthly) gets marked as spam as shown below.
The BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 values are something I am toying with for other
reasons. Seems odd these should hit either one of those tests.
So, on the one hand I can add them to whitelist and be done with it, or I can
add
them to missed HAM for re-learning.
Which is the best approach?
Both. Feeding it to Bayes helps to correct its behaviour for both
future messages from this sender and similar mail from others, and
welcomelist_from_(whatever) ensures that future mail from this sender
doesn't get caught.
I still use welcomelist_from_rcvd now and then for senders that are
(still) variously fumbling - or outright skipping - SPF and DKIM. :/
-kgd
