>
>
> dbg: extracttext: [3209409] (/usr/bin/zbarimg) finished: exit 1
> dbg: extracttext: [3209409] (/usr/bin/zbarimg) stderr output: execvp
> failed, errno = 2 (No such file or directory)
> warn: extracttext: error from /usr/bin/zbarimg, please verify
> configuration: execvp failed, errno = 2 (No such file or directory)
>
> but zbarimg is very much at that location:
> # ls -l /usr/bin/zbarimg
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28344 Apr 14 20:00 /usr/bin/zbarimg
>
> # QR-code decoder
> extracttext_external zbar /usr/bin/zbarimg -q -D {}
> extracttext_use zbar .jpg .png .pdf .webp
> image/(?:jpeg|png) application/pdf
> add_header all ExtractText-Uris _EXTRACTTEXTURIS_
>
> This is also a bit different than the example provided in ExtractText.pm.
> This happens when I run SA on an email as root:
>
> # spamassassin -t -D extracttext < buck-qr-code.eml
>
> # spamassassin --version
> SpamAssassin version 4.0.2-r1919157
> running on Perl version 5.38.2
>
It seems I was missing Ghostscript and ImageMagick on this system:
# /usr/bin/zbarimg -q -D zbar-image.pdf
execvp failed, errno = 2 (No such file or directory)
Magick: "gs" "-q" "-dBATCH" "-dSAFER" "-dMaxBitmap=50000000" "-dNOPAUSE"
"-sDEVICE=ppmraw" "-dTextAlphaBits=4" "-dGraphicsAlphaBits=4" "-r900x900"
"-sOutputFile=/tmp/gmgtZP0F" "--" "/t
mp/gmlfC5a5" "-c" "quit".
ERROR: Postscript delegate failed (zbar-image.pdf)
Afterwards installing, it extracts the URL, but takes 13s on a E5-2623 v4 @
2.60GHz fedora40 system to do it:
# time /usr/bin/zbarimg -q -D zbar-image.pdf
QR-Code:
https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/7c7d2b18-6e83-4c3c-a275-2eb2e105fa6a?bHN0cmFuZEBidWNra25pdmVzLmNvbQ==
real 0m13.361s
user 0m12.640s
sys 0m1.933s
So it looks like it kills it because it takes too long when running it
through SA?
dbg: extracttext: killed stale helper [3229331] (/usr/bin/zbarimg)
info: extracttext: [3229331] (/usr/bin/zbarimg) error: exit 15
dbg: extracttext: [3229331] (/usr/bin/zbarimg) stderr output: Magick:
quitting due to signal 51 (SIGTERM) "Terminated"...
Is there a way to control the timeout value? Or a more optimal method?
