On 2024-05-11 20:26:59 +0200, Thomas Barth wrote:
> Am 2024-05-11 19:24, schrieb Loren Wilton:
[...]
> > > found in
> > >
> > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.908 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
> > > tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
> > > DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.001, FSL_BULK_SIG=0.001,
> > > HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=2.43,
> > > RAZOR2_CHECK=1.729,
> > > SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL=1.948]
> >
> > Why is your score threshold for spam 6.31? By default it is 5, and that
> > message would have been spam.
>
> 6.31 has been the default value on a Debian system for ages and is based on
> the experience of the “spam analysts”.
No, Debian has not changed the default, which is 5.0, as I can see
for your message (here, on a Debian/stable machine):
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on joooj.vinc17.net
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DMARC_PASS,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
The value 6.31 does not even appear in the spamassassin source
package.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
