HI Josh, Thank you so much for your reply!
> Most likely, SA specifically whitelisting legit domains in those poisonous > TLDs which are brought to our attention by, for instance, reports like yours. > Less likely but possible: seeing enough ham claiming to be from those TLDs in > the masscheck contributors' corpora that the scores for those rules are > automatically reduced. > > A possible alternative that is under your control and will likely get faster > positive results than SA rules changes: register the domain > playdatesupport.com for your support department's use. They can still > *receive* email at supp...@play.date, but for outbound email that wouldn't be > the From: domain and thus wouldn't suffer the TLD reputational hit. (If you > do that, avoid setting "ReplyTo: supp...@play.date", as that would also take > a reputation hit.) Great thoughts, and I’ll discuss them with the crew. Regarding a (potential) whitelist of play.date — The Only Good .Date Domain® — would I… file a bug on that idea? Best, Cabel Panic PS: my last curiosity question: is there any built-in process within SA for re-reviewing the 22 “bad domains” periodically? Is it possible some get “better” over time or is that a pipe dream on my part?
