Hi, >>Does it sound reasonable to add 3 points plus another 1.5 simply for > >>having been sent by sendgrid? How do we offset those points? Do we > >>just rely on bayes/txrep? > >> > >>I think my bayes db is pretty well-trained, but there's also a lot > >>of account activation fraud emails. > > On 16.11.23 10:29, Kris Deugau wrote: > >Third party rule sets always need evaluation for your local mail flow. > > Just FYI: > AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS stock SA rule and has score 3 as OP complained: > > score AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS 2.999 2.999 2.999 2.999 >
Yes, of course, I realize I can control scores on my own system - I was just requesting an analysis because it seems quite high, and thought it deserved to be evaluated for everyone. Also, the KAM rules are designed to be used in conjunction with the stock rules, so it also seemed somewhat punitive to award so many points and to be expected to offset them for a completely benign email. Thanks, Alex
