> > I don't see a problem in this particular case. > > Nobody but SA or compatible spam filter adds X-Spam: headers. > These headers are to be added by your local MTA when delivering mail > and not > distributed over the net, although it happens. > They also should not be used for DKIM signatures. > > Trusting them generally when received from external source is silly, > just > like trusting "this mail does not contain viruses" headers. > > For those few sources I trust their x-spam* headers, I exclude > sending MTA > addresses. > > > Since I need to patch spamass-milter anyway to resolve a different > > issue (calling "sendmail -bv <recipient>" does not work on postfix > > systems) > > you can use -S option to override path to sendmail and call your own > script > instead of patching spamass-milter > >
Agreed, it's not a problem from the technical point of view, as it's not a problem to use the -S option to call something else which is not sendmail (that's what I am doing right now). It's more a matter of, well, cosmetics or aesthetics... Regards, Robert -- Robert Senger
