Noel Butler skrev den 2023-06-05 10:43:
On 05/06/2023 03:38, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

is sender-id still not depricated ?

it's status: historic. It's also patended and since it's broken by
design, there's no reason to support or use it.

Supporting it used to tip you over the "your-not-spam" line with MS's
cleanfeed, no idea if it still works that way as I lost my MS contact
when she left for greener pastures.

+1

X-Spam-Status No, score=-8.268 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[AUTHRES_AUTH_NONE=1.5, AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS=-1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RELAYCOUNTRY_GOOD=-0.1, RELAYCOUNTRY_GREY=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-0.2] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ausics.net
Authentication-Results  apache.org; auth=none
Authentication-Results spamproc1-he-fi.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ausics.net


--
Regards,

your signature is still big, keeping autoreader on

Reply via email to