Alan <spamassassin.tw...@ambitonline.com> writes:
> A lovely message from a reputable sender with a penchant for fancy
> email formatting has CSS rules expressed in JSON, presumably so it can
> adjust for the mail client or some such.
>
> A segment contains the text:
>
> "items":[{"type":"Input.Date","id":"date"}]}
>
> The KAM_SOMETLD_ARE_BAD_TLD rule is triggering on Input.Date. The rule is
> weighed quite high by default (5.0 here).
> This is pushing messages over the spam threshold. I've adjusted the weight
> locally but it's probably something that should be tweaked globally.
(The KAM rules are on the aggressive side, and downscoring is appropriate
for those who like to be a bit less aggressive, especially those who are
not comfortable with single rules over 4ish. But I am still running
them, because I think they help a lot more than they hurt.)
You seem to be suggesting reducing score, but that's not the real issue
in this case. What you have found, I think, is treating something like
a URL that isn't. However, that's really hard to fix given the MUA
so-called feature of treating things that sort of look like URLs as
URLs.
If you haven't, I would send the message in question to KAM for analysis
and perhaps rule adjustment.
FWIW, I find that I have adjusted score to 1.5.
