On 12/28/22 6:17 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Sigh. Yet another borderline ethical posting / tool like far too many pentesters who think transparency is the ultimate way to move the needle of security
Many tools can be used for both good and evil.
I have yet to find a kitchen knife that can tell the difference, much less behave differently when cutting bread vs the human operator.
SATAN, SARA, cops, crack, firesheep, metasploit, nmap, et al. come to mind as tools used to help identify weaknesses in security / defenses. It seems like Espoofer is yet another in a long line of such tools.
I will read about Espoofer, what it does, and how it does it in the spirit of securing my systems. I think that any such information has some value.
If nothing else, know they enemy.
while thinly veiling their search for love and attention that their mother didn't give them.
I see no need for the (minor) ad hominem attack and I don't think it brings anything to the conversation.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
