On 20.07.22 09:29, Alex wrote:
I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the
To field is missing?
10_hasbase.cf:header __HAS_TO exists:To
define:
meta MISSING_TO !__HAS_TO
Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.24.18])
by mail01.example.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 12425B9B
for <j...@gooddom.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
I realize I can match on the Received header here, but that would require
creating an additional rule for each corresponding To rule. Perhaps there's
a way to combine them, or a tag that can be used for both?
the main question is what do you want to match.
I'm also aware of using ALL, but I think that may be too broad and may
catch instances that shouldn't be. Can someone explain how this rule works
and if something similar would apply to my situation?
header __HDRS_MISSP ALL:raw =~
/^(?:Subject|From|To|Reply-To):\S/ism
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
