On 2022-05-06 11:25, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
Hi,
I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access
to the
data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
bayes-databases and saw that I can do that with a SQL-database. I have
already
a small galera-cluster and I wonder if spamassassin will work with it
because
of the limitations galera has.
The limitations are:
* only innodb
* unsupported explicit locking
* a primary key on all tables is necessary
* no XA transactions
* no reliance on auto-increment
Does anyone have experience with such a setup?
I see no reason why it wouldn't work, none of the limitations should
apply
to SpamAssassin.
fair, its just that redis is more prefered to bayes imho, and postgresql
is high performance without being memory hungry
