On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:50 AM, Bill Cole
<sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
SpamAssassin rules are not laws in any sense. They do not prescribe or
proscribe any action. They do not reflect any sort of moral or ethical
judgment. They do not express or define technical correctness.
Isn't that exactly what we're discussing here? "Technical correctness"?
The way I generally put it is: SpamAssassin is not an RFC-compliance audit
tool.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The police of a state should never be stronger or better armed
than the citizenry. An armed citizenry, willing to fight, is the
foundation of civil freedom. -- Robert A. Heinlein, 1942
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
549 days since the first private commercial manned orbital mission (SpaceX)
