Den 11-11-2021 kl. 20:21 skrev Greg Troxel:
It's a really interesting question what DNSWL_MED ought to be for score.
Given what MED is supposed to be:
Medium Rare spam occurrences, corrected promptly.
-2.3 points seems entirely reasonable.
But I don't see how gmail makes sense being medium, as spam from gmail
is not rare. Probably it happens to me every day. NONE seems more
appropriate, especially since I have no perception of google making a
serious attempt to avoid emanating spam. (I realize this comment
belongs on the DNSWL list, but for now I'm not bothered personally
because the v6 addrs aren't listed.)
Google (Gmail) is not, and have never been on medium.
Last score change on Google's addresses, was in June 2018, demoting the
last remaining ones from "low" to "none".
Are you by any chance forwarding traffic from one server to another,
and/or potentially missing something in your trusted_networks and/or
internal_networks? This one is *very* common.
Checking up with DNSWL is actually done by checking the first server in
reverse order, that your own server does not trust, so if the inbound
message you see was sent from Gmail, relayed over your friend's server
(which is/was at medium), and then finally hitting yours, and that you
do not have set your friend's server as one of your trusted ones, the
DNSWL check will be done on your friend's server, ending up with
flagging the message as medium.
--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Arne Jensen
