On 26 Jan 2021, at 20:57, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-01-27 02:43, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html
i dont know how to handle this :=)
Only one lists it:
https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/3.227.148.255
https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/2a01:4f9:c010:567c:0:0:0:1
SPFBL?
spf blacklist mostly
to be safe i do not use it in mta stage, but in sa its fine
But it's listed with a 127.0.0.3 result, which they document as:
127.0.0.3: flagged due difficulty to identify the responsible for
abuses or
MTA not in compliance with RFC 5321
So, I guess I should sign up to be listed too: I do things on every
system I help manage that RFC5321 says should not be done.
I cannot imagine how that result could be considered useful even in a
scoring system.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
