On 14 Jan 2020, Dean Carpenter spake thusly: > On 2020-01-14 7:05 am, Nix wrote: >> On 8 Jan 2020, Benjamin Block told this: >> >> ... looks like it to me. It's at least spotting the lock and breaking >> it, but it's still taking a second and a half to do it, and it happens >> for each message. That's better than the 90s it used to take, but still >> bad. >> >> I've come to the conclusion that TxRep is essentially unmaintained and >> basically doesn't work unless you use SQL storage, and have migrated >> back to the AWL, which still works fine. I hope I'm wrong. > > Are you saying that it DOES work cleanly when using SQL storage ? I've > been using AWL with SQL for years and it's been "fine".
Other people seem to be saying that. I never tried SQL anything with SpamAssassin, so I can't be sure. -- NULL && (void)
