On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, RW wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:29:40 -0700
Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Jan 3, 2020, at 11:34 AM, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:09:21 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
Try this instead, to actually match the header(s):
header __L_RECEIVED_SPF Received-SPF =~ /^./
That should be:
header __L_RECEIVED_SPF Received-SPF =~ /^./m
Seems to work either way!
Either should match, but without the /m it should only match once.
I just tried it and
meta L_RECEIVED_SPF (__L_RECEIVED_SPF >= 10)
doesn't work without the /m in __L_RECEIVED_SPF
Odd. I'll have to check that out. Perhaps SA is collapsing multiple
headers into a single line internally.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone who uses the word "profit" as a dirty word should be
watched very, very carefully. If they hate the idea of gain
through free trade it can only mean that they’re looking to
get it through robbery. -- Lyle@Ultimak
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
305 days until the Presidential Election
