On 12/11/19 3:17 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 2:39, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/19 6:21 AM, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
>>> Hi PFA...
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2019 12:36 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/19 7:49 PM, Michael Storz wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> My copy hit
>>>>>
>>>>> BODY_SINGLE_WORD=1.347, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=1.172, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79
>>>>>
>>>>> not enough to mark it as spammy.
>>>
>> FuzzyOcr + bayes is killing this kind of emails for me:
>
> FuzzyOcr is unmaintained and doesn't even have an authoritative repository as
> far as I can tell. It is computationally very expensive, to the degree that
> it isn't safe to just add it to an existing mail system which does not have a
> lot of idle CPU and memory capacity.
>
it's true that it's unmaintained but I have it running on Perl 5.28 with some
patches and it's still useful every now and then (if you have some spare cpu
cycles and you know what you are doing).
A new ocr plugin could be definetely a better choice.
Giovanni
