On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:17:23 +0300 Reio Remma wrote: > On 06/09/2019 09:57, @lbutlr wrote: > > On 6 Sep 2019, at 00:51, Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee> wrote: > >> Even though I recall QMail having TLSv1 back when we were still > >> using it. > > TLSv1.0 is EOLed and should not be used nor supported. > > > > But yes, mailing lists are therein reason I a=have not gone 100% > > TLS myself (it’s not just this one, sadly). > > > > There is very little desired email that does not come from lists > > that is not using TLS 1.1 or better (TLS 1.1 shouldn’t be used > > either, but I see a fair amount of 1.1 still, or did last I looked > > a few months ago). > > Apache lists also seem to break DKIM with the subject and content > modifications. Not all lists do that and they behave well on that > front.
I don't know about other Apache lists, but this one doesn't - unless the source does something silly like signing List-Id.
