On Jun 18, 2019, at 2:21 AM, Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> wrote: > >> rawbody AC_HIDDEN_FONT /font-size\s*:\s*0\s*(?:em|pt|px|%)\s*;/ >> > There is T_HIDDEN_WORD on my sandbox > (https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190617-r1861495-n/T_HIDDEN_WORD/detail) > I have just committed a more generic version.
Unfortunately I'm still seeing a bunch of spams with font-size: 0px that aren't hitting any sort of "hidden font" or "tiny font" rule. The above suggested rule would catch those, in case someone can try sandboxing that. I had also suggested matching on line-height:0 and similar, but it appears that those might be used in hams as well... so we might want to limit it to just font-size. But it looks like Giovanni's T_GB_HIDDEN_WORD isn't scoring so well lately... not sure how it compares to my suggestion above. Cheers. --- Amir
