Re: check_rbl digging too deep

[Henrik K]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:34:33AM +0000, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> I take this opportunity to point out that the correct rule for XBL should
> be:
> 
> header RCVD_IN_XBL eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal', 'zen.spamhaus.org.',
> '^127\.0\.0\.[4567]$')
> 
> The return code 127.0.0.8 has been dropped a long time ago.
> 
> More infos on 
> https://docs.spamhaustech.com/10-data-type-documentation/datasets/030-datasets.html#xbl

Thanks for the info, I've removed .8 from RCVD_IN_XBL rule.

Cheers,
Henrik