On Jun 17, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Antony Stone <antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote: > > If this feature *is* used for screenreaders, you could be creating a false > positive trap here...
You may well be right, hence the request to sandbox and see how it compares against masscheck. On Jun 17, 2019, at 1:25 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > > Since display:none is a pretty common method for showing and hiding elements > depending on things like screen size, I would guess this is going to hit > mostly ham. Wouldn't that only be true for dynamic content that can actually evaluate the screensize, and hence would require javascript? Or is there a way of doing this with static email content? (I'm very well versed in HTML for web browsers, but not as much for MUAs...) The font-size, line-height, max-height, max-width of would almost certainly be pretty spammy, I would imagine. Anyway, that's the whole point of sandboxing... Cheers! --- Amir
