Looks like it was hitting a fair amount of ham the last week or so. https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190607-r1860743-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail
The last few days have looked a bit better: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190609-r1860879-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190610-r1860930-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail 3 days good performance on ruleqa equals promotion followed by a scoring day. On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 19:13, Amir Caspi <ceph...@3phase.com> wrote: > On Jan 26, 2019, at 10:27 AM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Amir Caspi wrote: > > > >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 8:46 AM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Dec 20, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Amir Caspi <ceph...@3phase.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> header AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS From =~ /<(?:\w{2,}\.){2,}\w+@/ > >>> > >>> Argh. I lost track of that over the holidays. Thanks for the reminder, > adding it now. > >> > >> Anything interesting with the results on sandboxing this rule? > > > > Not really, at least not by itself. > > It looks like this rule was still being tested last month (I saw it > hitting a bunch of my spams), but now appears to be gone (it's not hitting > on spams that it normally would). Did you decide it wasn't sufficiently > useful, either alone or in meta? > > Cheers. > > --- Amir > >
