On Fri, 24 May 2019, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2019, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I see. This is another case where local clients hit bunch of rules
designed
to catch remote bots.
I'm thinking if I should disable the rule or if it's better to re-write it
only to match on remote (untrusted) hosts.
On 23.05.19 14:09, John Hardin wrote:
Probably the latter. For an untrusted host, match on any HELO that does not
have a period.
in such case it should match X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted, not Received headers.
Right.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet another example of a Mexican doing a job Americans are
unwilling to do. -- Reno Sepulveda, on UniVision reporters asking
President Obama some pointed questions about
the BATFE Fast and Furious scandal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until Memorial Day - honor those who sacrificed for our liberty
