On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:15:19PM +0100, RW wrote: > > Why are there no QA statistics for BAYES_* rules?
How do you propose to generate such statistics, when all contributors already are supposed to have fully sorted ham/spam corpuses? Seems kind of redundant as all spam would hit BAYES_99 etc. What comes to BAYES_* scores anyway, they are hand tweaked / immutable and not subject to rescoring. # make the Bayes scores unmutable (as discussed in bug 4505) https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4505 > Also why do all the network rule statistics come from a single > contributor labelled 'jarif'? A corpus with only 484 ham in it. Network rules are only run every saturday: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190511-r1859108-n jarif has some flags wrong if doing it every day..
