On Thu, 2 May 2019 03:15:13 +0000 David Jones wrote: > On 5/1/19 6:04 PM, RW wrote: > > On Wed, 1 May 2019 10:39:08 -0700 (MST) > > jandev wrote: > > > >> David, > >> > >> I tried to send the original email to the email address you > >> requested. But your mail hoster blocks (554 5.7.1) my TLDs. > > > > I doesn't really matter, you posted a link to pastebin on the list. > > > > It passed SPF with the envelope domain bounce.comm06.simpliv.com > > which matches: > > > > def_whitelist_auth *@*.simpliv.com > > > > 129.41.222.236 has a senderscore.org score of 94 currently
it was 84 in early April. > and is > listed in dnswl.org as score but do not block outright. That just means it's a known source of email and not a zombie or IP address controlled by an outright spammer. The level of trust is described as 'none', that's a lower level than some freemail servers. The DKIM signing domain isn't listed at all on dkimwl. > More importantly, it's [not] listed in Invaluement (IVM or IVM24): The Invaluement lists are marketed as low-FP. There's a huge difference between being good enough to stay out of Invaluement and being good enough for whitelisting at the -15 point level. > Every platform has the occassional bad customer that needs > to be kicked off From it's website simpliv.com appears to be a company that markets online training provided by third-party trainers. In that situation simpliv should be managing the lists and enforcing opt-in.
