On 25 Mar 2019, at 09:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
I can't see anywhere how smtps could mean multicast audio.
On 25.03.19 22:27, @lbutlr wrote:
That may have been a different use for port 465? I was operating from memory.
different use, but it was not called ssmtp.
what I want to say is that smtps always meant ssl'ed smtp.
I wasn't trying to do a ton of research on this. The point is 465 was a MSFT
thing
actually no. They used previously defined smtps. Yes, they used it after it
was deprecated, but in compatible way.
that they did ignoring the specs, as they loved to do (see breaking
kerberos and many other examples), but that there is a new RFC for the use
of port 465 as a submissions port (as opposed to the port 587 submission
port).
I've been using 465 with enforced authentication on many servers for years.
never heard about source-specific multicast (SSM) until now...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
