SOMEONE PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM THIS! I DONT KNOW WHAT THAT IS! Thank you! PLEASE PLEASE!
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Grant Taylor <gtay...@tnetconsulting.net> wrote: > >> On 01/15/2019 11:39 AM, Bill Cole wrote: >> This strikes me as a flaw in whatever milter you're using. Some (e.g. >> MIMEDefang) milters deal with the fact that they don't get a local Received >> header by constructing one from what they know before passing the message to >> SA. > > The SPF milter is constructing the header. I assume that it's doing so > properly. At least the headers I see coming out of the MTA are correct. > > I think that SpamAssassin is looking for a header that isn't there yet. - > Both SpamAssassin and my SPF filter are hooked into the same MTA as milters. > So both of them see the message before it's accepted and all headers new are > added. > > I don't know if the SPF milter can add the header sooner, or if that is > controlled by the MTA. > > I would also like SpamAssassin to use the information available to it via the > milter interface instead of relying on a header. > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die >
