On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > > Anyway, as of today I've capped those 2 subrules at levels which
> > > leave ample space to still match the target spam. Should show up
> > > in
> > > tomorrow's update.
> 
> I was wrong. The addition of a 'maxhits' parameter to the two
> subrules apparently didn't get committed in time for the nightly rule
> promotion run. It was in r1848602 and the current ruleset is still at
> r1848555. Assuming all goes well tonight, the change will appear
> tomorrow.
> 
> Rule updates never work quite as fast as I hope...

Ah, thanks for that Bill. I'll be sure to check the debug output when
sa-update is run tomorrow for the update version.

> 
> > I see in today's update that the subrule was changed from this:
> > 
> > if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf::feature_bug6558_free)
> >   ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ReplaceTags
> >     meta            T_MIXED_ES        ( __LOWER_E > 20 ) && (
> > __E_LIKE_LETTER > ( (__LOWER_E * 14 ) / 10) ) && ( (
> > __E_LIKE_LETTER /
> > __LOWER_E ) < 10 )
> >     describe        T_MIXED_ES        Too many es are not es
> 
> That's the functional meta-rule.
> 
> 
> > To this:
> > 
> > if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf::feature_bug6558_free)
> >   ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ReplaceTags
> >     body            __E_LIKE_LETTER /<E>/
> >     tflags          __E_LIKE_LETTER multiple
> 
> That's one subrule. Once my change filters through the update
> process, the 'tflags' lines for __E_LIKE_LETTER and __LOWER_E will
> be:
> 
>     tflags          __LOWER_E       multiple maxhits=250
>     tflags          __E_LIKE_LETTER multiple maxhits=400
> 
> 

-- 
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:24:10 up 3 days, 23:48, 1 user, load average: 1.21, 0.58, 0.31
Description:    Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.15.0-42-generic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to