On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:24:07 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail
and the above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
How can I do it without the fractions?
On 20.11.18 21:05, RW wrote:
meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH 4*__MAILBOX + 4*__LOCAL_EXCEEDED +
4*__LOCAL_STORAGE + 4*__LOCAL_LIMIT > 10
or
meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH __MAILBOX + __LOCAL_EXCEEDED +
__LOCAL_STORAGE + __LOCAL_LIMIT >= 3
note that the latter does not mean the same when either of those
rules has "tflags multiple" set (unless with maxhits=1)
If you set the same tflags for both versions they produce the same
results.
"tflags multiple" does not apply to metas,
I took it as read that he meant the flags of the sub-rules.
As did I, but on rereading it seemed ambiguous (using "either" vs. "any")
so I wanted to clarify.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
*Your* lack of self-control does not give you
the authority to dictate limitations on *my* freedom.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
603 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
