On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 20:20 -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi, this doesn't look like it should be considered a hex URI.
> 
> Nov 12 20:14:16.376 [15295] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_HEX ======>
> got hit: "https://api-89c8e17d";
> 
I didn't get any joy from playing with this one. By assuming that it
89c9e17d is a set of four x two 2 digit hex numbers, converting to
decimal and adding the dots, gives 137.200.225.125 which looks like an
IP (137.200.225.125) but 'host' says it doesn't resolve: 3(NXDOMAIN) 

Similarly 'host' couldn't resolve api-89c8e17d into an IP address,
though it is evidently a private subdomain of duosecurity.com. See
below.

> Nov 12 20:14:16.379 [15295] dbg: rules: ran uri rule
> __LOCAL_PP_NONPPURL ======> got hit:
> "https://api-89c8e17d.duosecurity.com";
>
Looking this up with 'host' got me the IP 54.241.191.167 
and a reverse lookup on that resolves it to:

ec2-54-241-191-167.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com.

IOW, its probably a good thing that it SA does think these are hex
addresses that can fire URI rules.

Martin



Reply via email to