On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:19:15 +0000
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 18:18 +0000, RW wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:26:29 +0000
> > Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> >
> > > describe MG_BARE_IP Bare IP in a URI
> > > body __MG_BAI0 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}/
> > > uri __MG_BAI1 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\/\w*/
> > > meta MG_BARE_IP (__MG_BAI0 || __MG_BAI1)
> > > score MG_BARE_IP 0.01
> > >
> > > Note that the bare IP - n.n.n.n - is NOT a URI and so must be a
> > > body
> > > text rule while the bare IP with a '/name' suffix is a URI and so
> > > is
> > > found by a URI rule.
> >
> > What I'm seeing is that an IP address is only identified as a URI if
> > there is a protocol. Having a path doesn't matter.
> >
> When I tested it here (SA 3.4.1),
I was using 3.4.2
> simply appending /alphastring to the
> bare IP caused it to be recognised by a URI rule. I was a little
> surprised as I'd been expecting the httpd:// or https:// prefix would
> be required.
