On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, micah anderson wrote:
John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> writes:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, micah anderson wrote:
John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> writes:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, micah anderson wrote:
OK, I can see about adding some mobile MUA exclusions. Any FP headers you
can provide (directly) will be helpful. Go ahead and sanitize the
recipient info, I don't think that would be relevant to tuning this one.
I put 4 of the messages here:
https://pastebin.com/YuPtBQXN
thanks for your help!
micah
Thanks.
Yesterday I added a FP avoidance check for DKIM based on the (very few)
ham hits that are in the masscheck corpus; it seems that should be enough
to avoid these messages as he's sending via gmail and it adds DKIM.
I'm adding some xmailer subrules - the mobile MUA coverage is thin. I
don't expect to see a lot of overlap, but I may add them anyway based on
your report.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians never accuse you of "greed" for wanting other people's
money, only for wanting to keep your own money. -- Joseph Sobran
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 73rd anniversary of the end of World War II
