On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:12:42 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 28.07.18 17:06, RW wrote: > >I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing > >dynamic IP addresses. And here: > > > > https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html > > > >commenting on listing history it says: > > > > > > "One also has to remember that IP addresses change hands. Many ISPs > > assign IP addresses to customers dynamically, so addresses are > > changing all the time." > > and the point is? > A-ha. ou put it in subject: > Re: Why is RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET not '-lastexternal'? > > well, the -lastexternal is for dynamic IPS, and spamcop lists spam > sources, not (just) dynamic addresses.
Most -lastexternal lists are mixed dynamic/static. Deep checks should be, and mostly are, list for exploitable servers or IP addresses under the control of spammers (or very spam friendly ISPs). RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET seems to be an anomaly.
