The warnings are OK though make sure you have the nonKAMrules.cf as well. I'm not seeing really any of these spamples for us and agree. It's scoring in the 1.2 range for me.
Clearly seems to be compromised url so RBLs are you likely bet but you might be a patient 0 for a new engine. -- Kevin A. McGrail VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Andy Smith <a.sm...@ldex.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > No I wasn't. I just added it, I get a lot of errors like "meta test > KAM_WARRANTY3 has dependency 'CBJ_GiveMeABreak' with a zero score", is this > normal? > > Testing despite these errors the only rule I'm getting a hit on from KAM > is JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL_ALL > > > thanks, Andy. > > > > On 19-06-2018 16:51, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Are you using the KAM.cf ruleset? > > >
