On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 00:54, David B Funk <dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu> wrote:
> 4) Less technical sophistication of the server side filtering VS google Both Google and Microsoft deliver a product for the masses. They are a mcdonald after all: you get the quality that you pay for. Google rejects messages with either failed dmarc or a banned file type, which is good, but also accepts advertisements, because it is *free* after all. A relative of mine, who insists in using gmail, spotted authentic messages to her from IRS and pension fund buried in thousands of spam. O365 is a paid-for service in the sense that one pays to receive spam. 2FA helps against intrusions, but I find people annoyed by the technology, so they disable it. Hence the hacked accounts with poor passwords. >
