I ran make test now - not exactly a pass.
There were lots of complaints about: "Maybe you need to kill a running
spamd process?" There was no spamd running.
The RPM is actually working nicely on our production system (after I
removed the = from spamc options).
This is all on CentOS 7.
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/basic_lint_without_sandbox.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
t/debug.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
t/lang_lint.t (Wstat: 1536 Tests: 8 Failed: 6)
Failed tests: 1, 3, 5-8
Non-zero exit status: 6
t/sa_check_spamd.t (Wstat: 768 Tests: 7 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 1, 6-7
Non-zero exit status: 3
t/spamc_x_e.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 7 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
t/spamc_x_E_R.t (Wstat: 768 Tests: 49 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 1, 10, 12
Non-zero exit status: 3
t/spamd.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 14 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 14
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 5 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 3
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_client.t (Wstat: 5120 Tests: 52 Failed: 20)
Failed tests: 2, 18-19, 31-32, 35, 37-42, 44, 46-52
Non-zero exit status: 20
t/spamd_maxchildren.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 22 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 22
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_report.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 6 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 6
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_report_ifspam.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 10 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 10
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_user_rules_leak.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 28 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 19
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/spamd_whitelist_leak.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 8 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1, 8
Non-zero exit status: 2
Files=169, Tests=3081, 793 wallclock secs ( 0.93 usr 0.69 sys + 174.60 cusr
30.48 csys = 206.70 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 14/169 test programs. 49/3081 subtests failed.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
On 19.04.2018 16:33, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Certainly sounds odd. Does make test pass before you build the RPM?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee
<mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee>> wrote:
On 19.04.18 9:45, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to use this to report spam:
spamc --reporttype=report --username=amavis < mail
However all I get is:
spamc[9632]: Please specify a legal report type
It works if I omit the = after --reporttype. This is with SA
3.4.2 from SVN, iirc it worked the other day with
--reporttype=report in 3.4.1.
I'm also curious about a log message when reporting:
spamd[9506]: spamd: handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: ''
*Update:* none of the --option= switches work.
handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I
have the -username switch as --username=amavis instead of
--username amavis
It worked in 3.4.1.
Is it at all possible that I botched the RPM for 3.4.2?
Reio
