On 2/22/2018 4:15 AM, saqariden wrote:
i'm using mimedefang with spamassasin, when I test an email with the
command "spamassain -t file.eml", I got results like this:
Dails de l'analyse du message: (-5.8 points, 3.0 requis)
-5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, high
trust
[70.38.112.54 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: L'algorithme Bayien a alula
probabilitde spam
entre 0 et 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
with no rDNS
0.3 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL To domain == From domain and external SPF
failed
However, the SA check which was done trough mimedefang, seems like
giving other scores, how can i test an email to get these scores, and
saw the difference.
Network tests and Bayesian tests could change in between runs.
Unless you ran the tests almost concurrently, this could be
normal/expected behavior.
I love MD and I don't run it with spamassassin it's space. I use a
system call to spamc and interpret the results. That way I'm always
using the same configuration for spamassassin and I can spam it onto
other servers easily.
Regards,
KAM
