The matter is controversial. Lists have own defaults, who often abuse their original aim of mere forwarding, especially when they redistribute from a long-term archive. On the other hand, people have own default banners for all outgoing correspondence, some with explicit reference to the applicable law and company policy. Sparks happen when they meet. A list's standpoint may be: if you do not want to be archived, then do not post. A person's standpoint may be that a mailing list standing as official publication is ludicrous, while individuals have a well established human right to freedom of speach. There are so many twists here that only a seasoned lawyer may have tell right from wrong.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 14:55, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > Am 20.02.2018 um 14:02 schrieb Rupert Gallagher: > Do you have the legal > right to do so? does the fool with the disclaimer have any legal right to > define whatever terms when sending to a public mailing-list? > On Tue, Feb > 20, 2018 at 00:23, @lbutlr > wrote: >> On 2018-02-19 (09:57 MST), Paul Stead > wrote: > ... >> I reject your terms @kreme.com> @kreme.com>
