Ah, yes, it's coming together now. Thanks for the tutorial. I'm assuming when you say "less than" and you are working with negative numbers, that the less than moves the score towards, for example, -200 from a for example, -150.
On 01/28/2018 03:12 PM, David Jones wrote: > On 01/28/2018 02:09 PM, David Jones wrote: >> On 01/28/2018 02:01 PM, Chip wrote: >>> I see that makes sense. Thanks for the clarity. >>> >>> However how do you get to 150? >>> >>> good DKIM = 100 >>> good SPF = 100 >>> >>> That totals 200 >>> >> >> Think about it for a minute. We are talking about negative numbers. >> There could be some spam hits that add a few points to a negative 200 >> to make it like -196.6 or -175.0. Anything less than minus 150 will >> have hit both SPF_PASS and DKIM_VALID_AU if those are the only >> shortcircuit'd hits. >> > > Or you can definitely do a meta rule like Benny suggested so you know > when both rules hit by a rule match rather than checking the score. > It just depends on what you are using to process the output and how > flexible it is to find the score and turn it into a number from a string. >
