On 01/11/2018 04:15 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:46:24 -0600
David Jones wrote:


I bet most mirrors have a cron entry like "*/10" ... If we still see
problems I can extend the delay some more.

But the point of a longer delay is that it gives rsync a guaranteed
minimum head start on the DNS. It doesn't rely on behaviour that
works today but might fail in 5 years time when everyone's forgotten
why the delay was needed.


I am not sure what you are suggesting we do differently. I am open to suggestions. I added a comment to the script so it should be pretty clear why the sleep command was added back.

Another bug was opened to add more logic to sa-update to handle download problems and retry a few times to handle mirror problems better.

--
David Jones

Reply via email to