Am 2017-12-22 12:04, schrieb Axb:
On 12/22/2017 10:58 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
Am 2017-12-21 18:08, schrieb Axb:
On 12/21/2017 05:20 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
RW skrev den 2017-12-21 17:12:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:40:13 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
is this plugin used at all ?
i see freemail defines __ml why does it not use maillist.pm to
detect
maillists ?
asking since i have a own plugin where i like to use this plugin
for
my own needs to detect maillist so my rules does not hit there
There's no such plugin in SA or in the list of custom plugins.
In a search there were a two hit on a Maillist.pm which appears to
be
unrelated to SA. All the other hits were from you.
https://apache.googlesource.com/spamassassin/+/bug-5293-pluginized-bayes/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/MailingList.pm
i like to use this module, sorry its not a plugin, but it is there
hope to bring it to live with a rule
don't understand the need for this when a handfull of header rules do
just the same and way more efficiently.
What am I missing?
This is interesting. Can you explain why a handfull of header rules
would be more efficient than using a dedicated Perl module? I always
thought the opposite would be true.
Michael
Why do you think the use of a dedicated Perl module would be the
better choice for this case?
Because header rules are another layer on top of Perl. Perl uses
short-circuit evaluation for boolean operators whereas meta rules
evaluate all terms. Several functions of HeaderEval.pm could be
expressed by header rules, but they have been programmed as procedures.
Michael
