> Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> kirjoitti 14.11.2017 kello 19.59: > > > >> Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> kirjoitti 14.11.2017 kello 19.24: >> >> >> >> Am 14.11.2017 um 17:46 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >>>> Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> kirjoitti 14.11.2017 kello 18.42: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> kirjoitti 14.11.2017 kello 15.30: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 14.11.2017 um 07:11 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >>>>>> I have a couple of issues with my LAN /w SpamAssassin, >>>>>> 1. Wrong resolved used >>>>>> Nov 14 07:51:51 whirlwind spamd[4041]: spamd: connection from >>>>>> gamecock.fredriksson.dy.fi [192.168.1.123]:59338 to port 783, fd 5 >>>>>> Nov 14 07:51:51 whirlwind spamd[4041]: spamd: processing message >>>>>> <20171114055150.15886142...@mail.bitwell.biz> for spam:1001 >>>>>> Nov 14 07:51:51 whirlwind spamd[4041]: dns: sendto() to [::1]:53 failed: >>>>>> Connection refused, failing over to [127.0.0.1]:53 >>>>>> Nov 14 07:51:51 whirlwind spamd[4041]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53 >>>>>> failed: Connection refused, failing over to [::1]:53 >>>>>> $ cat /etc/resolv.conf >>>>>> jarif@whirlwind:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf >>>>>> # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by >>>>>> resolvconf(8) >>>>>> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN >>>>>> # 127.0.0.53 is the systemd-resolved stub resolver. >>>>>> # run "systemd-resolve --status" to see details about the actual >>>>>> nameservers. >>>>>> nameserver 127.0.0.53 >>>>>> search fredriksson.dy.fi >>>>> >>>>> horrible idea on a server to begin with >>>> >>>> It is actually a dual boot Ubuntu / Windows 10 workstation. Acts as an >>>> additional spamd when on Linux mode. >> >> spam-detection after the MX which can't reject is worthless but taht's a >> different topic > > My MX can (bitwell.(fi|biz)) using postcreen, clams-milter and > spamass-milter). ja...@iki.fiis a bit problematic as the mail comes to me > from a iki.fi forwarding service which I joined some 1995. The purpose of > that service is to offer an ever valid email-address that will be forwarded > to whichever the real mailbox happens to be. It’s a bit outdated concept > these days, but there it is). My MX rejects those still but not by postscreen. > > I think my postscreen setup was made specifically after YOUR advice. If that > is so, then thank You. It works like charm. > > br. jarif > > >> >>> .. and 127.0.0.53 is the NetworkDamager and it’s companion DNSMasq. I hate >>> those, but will not once again remove them just the get them back as I >>> upgrade that Ubuntu >> >> than Ubuntu is crap but why don't you do your homework then learn how to >> prevent it touching /etc/resolv.conf or just protect the file with "chattr >> +i /etc/resolv.conf”? > > If I wanted that I could do it. If I find out that dnsmasq does not honor > dhcp then I will. Give him a sack. > >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ touch /etc/resolv.conf >> touch: setting times of '/etc/resolv.conf': Operation not permitted >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ chattr -i /etc/resolv.conf >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ touch /etc/resolv.conf >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ touch /etc/resolv.conf >> touch: setting times of '/etc/resolv.conf': Operation not permitted > > Kludge.
I know with 100% certainty that dnsmasq does honor the DHCP. If that would be else, I could not access my LAN servers at all, I could not watch TV from TV server with VDR DVB streams. But I can. The problem is that SpamAssassin seems to irrational. My original question was and is: where does it get it’s resolver?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
