On Sunday, February 20, 2005, 11:23:33 AM, Cris Fuhrman wrote: > At my day job, our sysadmins have been using SpamAssassin for over a > year. I'm not sure they feed it ham/spam as needed to keep the > accuracy up to snuff -- I don't know if it's configured to use > block-lists. It blocks offensive spams, probably using some regex > stuff. However, I still get 25+ spams/day. They initially asked us to > send them spams that get through, which I was happy to do. But I > frankly have better things to do now with my time, especially given > the amount of spam I get.
Please ask them to use SURBLs, like you are at home. That should catch a lot more spams if they're not using them, even without Bayes. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
