On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:13 AM 2/12/2005, Theodore Heise wrote:
> > > The XBL however, has the "notfirsthop" restriction. It won't match
> > > any messages that have no trusted relays. Based on the debug
> > > output, there were no trusted relays, thus XBL would not have
> > > matched for this reason.
> >
> >I think I follow this for why it didn't match on initial processing,
> >but I still don't understand why it matched the message *after* I
> >saved it and ran it through spamassassin -t.
>
> Were there any extra Received: headers added after you received it?
There's only one Received: header in the whole message, and it
doesn't even show receipt by my mail server--I still don't
understand this part.
All the headers are below. The very first header (the From) seems
to be what the XBL is hitting. Perhaps this header is added by
procmail just before delivery and after SA scans the message?
Ted
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 21:02:20 2005
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from freereed.net ([220.175.203.188])
by linus.heise.nu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j1C21xw5010674;
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:02:02 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:14:52 +1200
Reply-To: "humberto akins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "humberto akins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Efrain Worth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: For quality ink products at bargain prices, visit us
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on linus.heise.nu
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_SBL,
URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.0.0
Status: R
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
