> 3) Stop using AWL. Seriously, I found it did more harm then > good and got big too fast.
I don't have any problem with it, and it is doing it's job quite well actually. BUT I do think that it will only work if you have a good working setup, in which there is a clear distinction in score's for both ham and spam. Otherwise, it may backfire. Without any extra rule-sets and or various net-lookups (SPF, SURBL, etc), I can't indeed imagine that it will work... Also, the AWL-factor may need some tuning, in order to have a possitive effect. > --Chris Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus
