On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:34:44 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 4:52:53 PM, mouss mouss wrote: > > Jeff Chan wrote: > >> On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:22:24 AM, Matthew Romanek wrote: > >> > >>>FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL > >>>appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's > >>>resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't > >>>like. > > > use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, or better, an IP of one of the > > physical interfaces. there seems to be a bug with sock_dgram code. > > Matthew > Was the OS Fedora Core 1 for this bug? > > Mouss, > If there's a bug would you please submit it to them? > > Jeff C. > -- > Jeff Chan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.surbl.org/ > >
Indeed it was. However, the fix was fairly straight forward. There was an entry for 127.0.0.1 in the /etc/resolv.conf. When that was changed to the interface IP, everything started working again. It's been repro'd. Something just doesn't like using the loopback interface for DNS lookups.
