-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes: > At 09:11 PM 2/2/2005, Shane Mullins wrote: > >Here is a link from ZDNet warning of a spam increase. I can't wait to > >see SA smat it down. > > Hmm.. so zombies are going to start using the legit mailserver instead > of acting as a direct delivery... Hmm.. Well, we should see the DUL RBL > hits drop off pretty fast. Won't affect SURBL hits though. all blocklists looking at the last-untrusted host in the Received headers will have a problem; XBL, SORBS, NJABL. That host will be the ISP's mailserver. Perhaps it's time to re-enable DNSBL lookups further into the Received headers, as we used to do in pre-3.0.0 versions... > The only problem I see with the tactic is the ISP itself is likely to deal > with the infected users pretty quickly, instead of dragging their feet, > since the spam will now be bogging down their servers, instead of bypassing > them. yep! that's the good news. kind of. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCAYxHMJF5cimLx9ARAkwRAJwOo5lv2/KG7+I8Msbp9WQKrhmFDwCcDJgo oDeBwEzPrDn7HkYZ/WI2F8o= =0j4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
